Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
JBRA Assist Reprod ; 24(2): 219-225, 2020 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2067109

ABSTRACT

The current outbreak of the novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) started in China in December 2019 and has since spread to several other countries. On March 25, 2020, a total of 375,498 cases had been confirmed globally with 2,201 cases in Brazil, showing the urgency of reacting to this international public health emergency. While in most cases, mild symptoms are observed, in some cases the infection leads to serious pulmonary disease. As a result, the possible consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak for pregnant women and its potential effects on the management of assisted reproductive treatments, demand attention. In this review, we summarize the latest research progress related to COVID-19 epidemiology and the reported data of pregnant women, and discuss the current evidence of COVID-19 infections during pregnancy and its potential consequences for assisted reproductive treatments. Reported data suggest that symptoms in pregnant women are similar to those in other people, and that there is no evidence for higher maternal or fetal risks. However, considering the initial data and lack of comprehensive knowledge on the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy, human reproduction societies have recommended postponing the embryo transfers and do not initiate new treatment cycles. New evidence must be considered carefully in order to adjust these recommendations accordingly at any time and to guide assisted reproductive treatments.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Reproduction , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Syst Biol Reprod Med ; 67(4): 260-269, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1249263

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is an unprecedented global situation, and all countries have adopted their own measurements to mitigate the spread of the virus in the first as well as in the subsequent waves of infection. All measures, especially in the first wave of the pandemic, were in combination with recommendations provided by professional and scientific organizations. Similar measures were applied to specific procedures, such as the management of infertility, including in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatments. Although there is no clear scientific evidence yet that the SARS-CoV-2 may exert negative effects on IVF outcome, especially at the early stages, several clinical reports indicate that the virus may impact male fertility through specific receptors presented at the somatic cells of the testis and used by the virus in order to gain entry to the respective cells. Nevertheless, it is not unreasonable to suspect that the virus may affect sperm function as well as oocyte performance directly through specific receptors or indirectly through other signaling pathways. Despite the good practice of IVF laboratory techniques, culture media may also be contaminated during equilibration when airborne virus's particles can contaminate culture media from an already infected embryology area or staff. Furthermore, although there is no clinical evidence, liquid nitrogen could be a route of infection for gametes and embryos when it has been contaminated during production or transportation. Therefore, cryopreservation of gametes and embryos must be virus-free. This communication aims to provide some aspects of the possible impact of the virus on gametes and embryos and how it may affect the cryopreservation procedures.Abbreviations: ACE2: angiotensin- converting enzyme 2; ART: assisted reproductive technology; ASRM: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; ESHRE: European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; ET: embryo transfer; FSH: follicle stimulating hormone; IFFS: International Federation of Fertility Societies; IVF: in vitro fertilization; LH: luteinizing hormone; LN: liquid nitrogen; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; T: testosterone; WHO: World Health Organization.


Subject(s)
Blastocyst/virology , COVID-19/virology , Cryopreservation , Infertility/therapy , Oocytes/virology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Spermatozoa/virology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/transmission , Embryo Transfer , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Infertility/diagnosis , Infertility/physiopathology , Male , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects
3.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 41(3): 361-364, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-613994

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly increased mortality in many countries, with the number of infected cases increasing exponentially worldwide. One of the main determining factors of the poor prognosis in these patients is the development of coagulopathy. Moreover, it is well known that assisted reproductive technology procedures confer a risk of thromboembolic complications. This commentary analyses specific aspects coexisting between the thrombotic risk described during virus infection and that reported in the context of assisted reproduction treatments. Based on known pathophysiological aspects of virus infection and of ovarian stimulation, there are common elements that deserve to be taken into account. In the present context, any risk of hyperstimulation should be avoided. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist triggering should be mandatory in high-responder patients and/or those with COVID-19 infection. In both cases, the cycle should be segmented. A proposal is made for the use of prophylactic low molecular weight heparin not only in those cases in which oocyte retrieval has been performed, but also in those in which cancellation has been decided. In addition, endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfers should use the transdermal route in order to minimize the higher thrombotic risk associated with the oral route.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/virology , COVID-19 , Embryo Transfer/methods , Female , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/administration & dosage , Humans , Oocyte Retrieval , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/complications , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/prevention & control , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/virology , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
4.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 37(6): 1265-1266, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-601535
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL